![]() ![]() What sustains hegemonic practices associated with forest governance and what can be done to challenge them? Given the current debates around the potential of forests to address the climate crisis (Bastin et al., Reference Bastin, Finegold, Garcia, Mollicone, Rezende, Routh, Zohner and Crowther2019 Lewis et al., Reference Lewis, Mitchard, Prentice, Maslin and Poulter2019 Veldman et al., Reference Veldman, Aleman, Alvarado, Anderson, Archibald, Bond and de Sá Dechoum2019), it is timely and necessary to reflect on what we know already and how forest governance is locked-in by discursive, institutional and material expressions of power premised upon an historical colonial legacy that enables private investments in forest lands and the exploitation of forest resources around the world. The combination of meaningful alternatives that would transform forest governance is increasingly unclear. Nonetheless, conventional approaches to governing forests predominantly focus on establishing and protecting private property rights, creating markets and mobilizing private finance, and they fail to effectively – and equitably – address the underlying drivers of deforestation. The SDGs underscore the importance of interconnectivity and holistic strategies for more sustainable forest governance. In the context of the Paris Agreement and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), there is increasing emphasis on technologies and approaches that raise ambitions for the sustainable governance of forests. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |